Re: Adoption call for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit

I support adoption.

If it were to be adopted, I think it would be useful to formalize the
inclusion criteria because there's a lot of non-SF headers out there. It
might also be useful to understand how implementation status of this spec
might be measured.

Cheers,
Lucas

On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 6:37 PM Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com> wrote:

> Hello HTTP,
>
> This email starts a working group adoption call
> for draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit (Retrofit Structured Fields
> for HTTP), which was discussed as potential new work at our interim meeting
> last week.
>
> You can find the draft here:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit-02.html
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-http-structure-retrofit/
>
> This adoption call will last for two weeks. Please reply to this email by
> Monday, February 21, and indicate whether you think this document should be
> adopted by the WG.
>
> Best,
> Tommy
>