- From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2022 22:55:12 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 20. Jan 2022, at 09:22, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Here is an potential example that uses the draft IETF JSONPath query >> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jsonpath-base/>): > > I agree that more examples would be good. However, this would introduce > a dependency on a draft that is likely to be finished farer in the > future. Unless the example is normative and not just an example, I don’t think that this would get in the way. (And the jury is still out on the race between the two drafts. You did start earlier :-) > Maybe there's a simpler-but-standardized JSON query language Well, you could use RFC 6901 JSON Pointer. > that we can use (optimally with a defined media type…). Thanks for the reminder! Grüße, Carsten
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2022 21:55:28 UTC