- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 09:58:55 +0200
- To: Eric J Bowman <mellowmutt@zoho.com>, Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net>
- Cc: Guoye Zhang <guoye_zhang@apple.com>, ietf-http-wg <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Am 07.04.2022 um 10:00 schrieb Eric J Bowman: > > > > Explain for me how a Unix filesystem makes PATCH impractical? > > > > Wrong takeaway entirely. I was trying to bring the discussion around to > a filesystem paradigm that's been agreed upon since before I was born, > because sometimes it helps to do so when discussing HTTP in theory... > this is one of those times, I think, unless I've introduced confusion -- > in which case I apologize, pragmatism is always my goal. > > A resource has to exist first, before it can support PATCH. Leaving it > possible to PATCH a DELETEd resource back into existence -- 410 implies > ... Says who? Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 10 April 2022 07:59:26 UTC