Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (5964)

Hello,

This works for me, and sounds proper -- it formally transfers the work
to the newly posted issue on GitHub.

-Rick

> But we have to deal with the erratum in any case. I believe that what
> RFC 7230 says is intentional, so within the scope of the erratum we
> should deal with adjusting the prose referring to RFC 3986. Thus "Held
> For Update".

Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 16:18:01 UTC