- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 15:43:15 +0800
- To: Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Alex Martinez <amartine@redhat.com>
Hi Roberto, Good to year the feedback was well-received. As a reminder, this draft hasn't been adopted by the group yet. I think that discussing the proposal on-list is appropriate, but it's not an official WG item yet, so we won't call a meeting about it yet. Regards, > On 19 Nov 2019, at 3:37 pm, Roberto Polli <robipolli@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi @all > > and thank you for all the feedback provided during yesterday's presentation! > > https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tDBzMZ81iDXmGjQR2yaxuQ5-W03Xeerllkr_9PYsOtw/edit#slide=id.p > > It would be great to organise a remote meeting to push forward the > spec (we're in CET timezone though). > > Some points: > > - support scope > https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/issues/70 > - support for structured headers (help wanted > https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/issues/35) > - relationship with proxies and security considerations > - improve FAQ (eg. why github ratelimit model is not enough and > contributes to header proliferation) > https://github.com/ioggstream/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers/blame/master/draft-polli-ratelimit-headers.md#L1011 > > > Thanks again to everyone, > Roberto > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2019 07:43:29 UTC