Re: Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-cdn-loop-01: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

> On 21 Dec 2018, at 1:44 pm, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:40:11PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 21 Dec 2018, at 12:13 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> We have a situation with two alternate topologies:
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  A -> B -> Origin
>>>> 2.  A ->  Origin
>>>> 
>>>> The original HTTP client (i.e., an external attacker on the Internet) sends a request with a CDN-Loop header containing B. In topology (1) this causes some kind of failure and in topology (2) it does not, thus leaking the topology.
>>> 
>>> Ah - so you're saying that 'A' is also a CDN, not the user-agent?
>>> 
>>> If the answer is 'yes', I understand; will add some text.
>> 
>> I've added:
>> 
>> """
>> A CDN's use of the CDN-Loop header field might expose its presence. For example, if CDN A is configured to forward its requests to CDN B for a given origin, CDN B's presence can be revealed if it behaves differently based upon the presence of the CDN-Loop header field.
>> """
> 
> Sorry for being slow to catch up.
> 
> It's not entirely clear to me that you actually need A to be a CDN for this
> to work -- if I want to know if CDN B is used to serve a given origin,
> can't I just tell my browser to add B's CDN-Loop header field to the
> request?  (With the idea being that if that change causes me to not get
> content, then I know CDN B is in use.)

I'm not following you. There are any number of ways to determine that a given CDN is configured to serve a given origin; how does CDN-Loop specifically change this?

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Friday, 21 December 2018 02:47:03 UTC