Re: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-httpbis-07-00: (with COMMENT)

On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Mirja,
> 
> On 10 Nov 2018, at 5:52 pm, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> > First an editorial one: should it be "HTTP/2 Revision" instead of "HTTP/1.1
> > Revision", or maybe just "HTTP Revision(s)"?
> 
> The documents that refers to are the HTTP/1.1 document set, although 
> many of them will emerge as just "HTTP...".
> 
> 
> > Then regarding the HTTP and QUIC part. I found it a bit weird and probably also
> > unecessary to mention review intentions in the charter.
> 
> They're mentioned in the QUIC charter, so it seemed good to mirror them here.
> 
> 
> > However, I guess we
> > need at some point to discuss what to do with HTTP/3 after the QUIC group has
> > finsihed their mapping document. Is the intention to do another re-charter
> > then? Should we then maybe just wait until we have a better plan before we say
> > anything about this in ther httpbis charter?
> 
> The chairs discussed this and I thought we'd agreed on some text, but I 
> see that hasn't made it into datatracker; Alexey?

I have updated the charter since. Mirja, can you double check charter-ietf-httpbis-07-01?

> > The timing doesn't seem to be
> > optional for me here but I assume the recharter is coming up because H2 is
> > basically done...?
> 
> We realised that the charter was pretty out-of-date, and this initiated 
> before we had the discussion about maintenance of the QUIC HTTP 
> documents.

Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2018 17:54:45 UTC