- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 14:30:10 -0400
- To: Alessandro Ghedini <alessandro@ghedini.me>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On 10 Sep 2018, at 5:24 am, Alessandro Ghedini <alessandro@ghedini.me> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 04:44:46PM +1000, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> FYI; IMO it's past time to standardise x-cache and have a real spec for it. >> >> This is a straw-man, based on a bit of research on existing implementations. >> >> Pretty version at: >> https://mnot.github.io/I-D/cache-header/ >> >> Comments? I think the primary audience here is proxy cache and CDN vendors, and their users. > > This seems like a useful thing. Now to the bikeshedding: "Cache" seems a bit > too generic to me, "Cache-Status" maybe? I used "Cache" because current practice is using "X-Cache". Happy to bikeshed on other names :) > Also agree that the "ERROR" cache-action seems redundant given that we already > have ways to signal errors with status codes. Yes. That's a discussion worth digging into; I've got another spec in the wings for that... Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 17 September 2018 18:30:35 UTC