Sold On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > WFM, committing. > > Thanks, > > > > On 12 Jan 2018, at 10:19 am, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > "present" seems too weak. You need to prove possession of the private > key, not just show it. How about "authenticate with"? > > > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > > > > > On 12 Jan 2018, at 9:38 am, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > > > > I am looking for text which is technically accurate. the current text > is not, for any sense of "obtain". What is required here is that the server > authenticate to the client with a private key that corresponds to a > certificate which passes the suitable tests. That's entirely different from > "obtain". > > > > How about: > > > > Original: """ > > Note that for a connection to be considered authoritative for a given > origin, the client is still required to obtain a certificate that passes > suitable checks...""" > > > > Update: """ > > Note that for a connection to be considered authoritative for a given > origin, the server is still required to present a certificate that passes > suitable checks...""" > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
Received on Thursday, 11 January 2018 23:27:21 UTC