- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 10:17:47 +0000
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <9b4f808b-8586-d3ff-ffef-4e9fe48a725a@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke writes: >I would say that the incentives are exactly the same for the two >variants. If the spec makes a mandatory requirement on the recipient >that is easy to implement, why would implementations choose to follow it >for SH but not for JFV? Because with SH somebody underqualified won't stop reading at JSON and think he knows how this song goes and thus miss all the restrictions ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 10:18:12 UTC