> On Jun 7, 2018, at 4:26 AM, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > >> §5.2: "425 (Too Early): Are there degrees of earliness? > > We've had some bikeshedding discussions on this one. I also proposed clearer > (to me) alternatives which were longer such as "Early Data Not Acceptable", > and in the end we really don't care since for a few decades, humans have > stopped reading reasons. We've thought about other ones like "Unsafe" but > it doesn't say why it's unsafe and will cause confusion if we later want > to add other "unsafe" reasons. So let's keep the short one, especially to > gracefully handle situations where we could expect that batches of pipelined > requests would get rejected at once. Apologies, I meant to put a “ :-)” on this comment :-) Otherwise, your responses all look good to me. Ben.
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2018 14:08:50 UTC