- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 23:53:11 +0000
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <ABC96E9C-7426-4DEB-9E06-6CF0EA4FC46E@mnot.net>, Mark Nottingham wri tes: >Just a thought; maybe we shouldn't be defining "numbers" here, but >instead "i32" or similar. The reason we have non-integers is the q=%f ordering parameter, and that the pre-cursor draft tried to be a general purpose serialization. Neither of those may not be a good enough reasons to keep number under this new scope/goal. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:53:36 UTC