- From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:58:20 +0900
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Alex, 2017-11-01 1:07 GMT+09:00 Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>: > On 10/30/2017 07:24 PM, Kazuho Oku wrote: > >> So why not mandate support for 64-bit integers? > > The draft already mandates support for (signed) 64-bit integers AFAICT: > > >> integer = ["-"] 1*19 DIGIT >> >> Integers SHALL be in the range +/- 2^63-1 (= +/- 9223372036854775807) > > > The 15-digit limit is for floating point "numbers", not integer numbers. > There may be a naming problem, but I do not see a 64bit integer problem. I think you that you might be referring to Common Header Structure [1] instead of Structured Headers [2]. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-structure/?include_text=1 [2] https://mnot.github.io/I-D/structured-headers/ > > Cheers, > > Alex. -- Kazuho Oku
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 00:58:45 UTC