- From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 14:50:09 -0700
- To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
- Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints@ietf.org, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mnot@mnot.net, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-04: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I don't understand this text: " HTTP/2 ([RFC7540]) server push can be used as a solution to this issue, but has its own limitations. The responses that can be pushed using HTTP/2 are limited to those belonging to the same origin. " Isn't this also a limitation of 103?
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2017 21:50:33 UTC