Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2

On 03/10/2017 11:19 AM, Adrien de Croy wrote:
>
> thanks for that.
>
> Yes, the whole meta discussion about why / benefits etc can influence 
> adoption pressure, and decisions around whether we should support it 
> or block it.

If I can run websockets over it, it will already be more useful than 
http/2 for me...

-Andy
>
> Cheers
>
> Adrien
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
> Cc: "Mike Bishop" <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>; "quic@ietf.org" 
> <quic@ietf.org>; "HTTP working group mailing list" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Sent: 10/03/2017 4:12:48 PM
> Subject: Re: HTTP/QUIC Diverging from HTTP/2
>
>> On 10 March 2017 at 13:59, Adrien de Croy <adrien@qbik.com> wrote:
>>>  for the benefit of those of us who maybe aren't so familiar with 
>>> QUIC, are
>>>  there any good resources you can refer us to which deal with the 
>>> bigger
>>>  picture such as why even have QUIC?
>>
>>
>> This probably isn't the place for that discussion.  I would recommend
>> reading the drafts.  They aren't complete, but you will gain some
>> appreciation for what is going on.  Think about this in terms of
>> replacing TCP, not HTTP.  There are higher level things around, like
>> this old presentation:
>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1T9GtMz1CvPpZtmF8g-W7j9XHZBOCp9cu1fW0sMsmpoo 
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 03:25:37 UTC