- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 15:10:59 +1100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 7 February 2017 at 15:07, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Folks, please have a look at this and confirm that this is the intent. Note that after reading Scott's last email, I've made a small tweak to what I proposed originally (that is, the priority of many streams can be affected). > Martin, I'm assuming the status we want is HOLD FOR DOCUMENT UPDATE? Yup. p.s., I think that it's awesome that these emails go to mailto:text/plain@rfc-editor.org and mailto:charset=UTF-8@rfc-editor.org
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 04:11:33 UTC