- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 09:18:27 +1100
- To: Frederik Deweerdt <fdeweerdt@fastly.com>
- Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2 February 2017 at 03:46, Frederik Deweerdt <fdeweerdt@fastly.com> wrote: > + The TLS implementation MUST support the Server Name Indication (SNI) > + [TLS-EXT] extension to TLS. HTTP/2 clients MUST indicate the target > > I've seen HTTP/2 servers reject the connection if the client doesn't send an > SNI. My memory was clearly faulty. Mark's "if anything" comment lead me to infer that SNI was optional. As it isn't, this isn't a problem. The point about coalescing stands.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 22:19:04 UTC