- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:01:31 +0200
- To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hi Kazuho, On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:03:24PM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote: > One question: is the name `early-data` a good choice? > > The reason I raise the concern is because what the header suggest is > if the endpoint has not yet seen a proof (i.e. ClientFinished). The > name "early-data" might be confusing since it may seem to imply _when_ > the request has been received rather than the current state of the > connection. You mean that you'd prefer something indicating that there were unsafe (ie not yet validated) early data in fact, that's it ? Willy
Received on Monday, 26 June 2017 08:02:06 UTC