- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 15:38:10 +1000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Cc: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, "Ponec, Miroslav" <mponec@akamai.com>, "Kaduk, Ben" <bkaduk@akamai.com>
On 12 May 2017 at 15:28, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> wrote: > And we're back to the original point : if we do this for all requests, > we're just doing 1-RTT 100% of the time in the end. Two reasons why it isn't, or might not be: 1.The suggestion was that you would identify a subset of requests that get passed on. That might be GET, HEAD and OPTIONS if you want to be conservative. 2. The data has arrived in less than 1-RTT. That you don't act on it later doesn't mean that you haven't at least saved on the time it takes to move those bytes. The downside being that your handshake completion now sits behind a longer line of bytes that are all subject to loss and therefore head of line blocking.
Received on Friday, 12 May 2017 05:38:45 UTC