W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-03.txt

From: Ilya Grigorik <ilya@igvita.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:51:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKRe7JFkmrjMQ2UHfBr94vLuASDe5p36mJHVEHYGfrGtY9NSbQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
wrote:

> --------
> In message <e90e3aa8-9e53-f077-f6ab-7c7fc50e0061@gmx.de>, Julian Reschke
> writes
> :
>
> >>>>>        Title           : HTTP Client Hints
> >>>>> [...]
> >>>>>     Save-Data = sd-token *( OWS ";" OWS [sd-token] )
> >>>>>     sd-token = token
> >>>>
> >>>> Why isn't this list separated by "," like we usually do ?
> >>>
> >>> It's consistent with other client hints which do not use list syntax...
> >>> That said, the prose should state like for the other hints...
> >>
> >> It may be consistent, but it is a good idea, if we want to make life
> >> simpler down the road ?
> >
> >No opinion on that right now; just explaining how the draft likely got
> >there.
>
> Ok.
>
> I'd like to suggest that we make these two (?) drafts conform to
> common structure, by making the lists comma separated.
>

Background: https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/168

We didn't intend Save-Data to be a list.. The goal was to allow attributes
on the single token defined in CH. I'll defer to Mark on Key.
Received on Monday, 5 December 2016 21:52:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 5 December 2016 21:53:00 UTC