W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?

From: Daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:47:17 +1100
Message-ID: <CAEnbY+fMJdxg1YbBYeCY0DcNBi810PWW4CuWDYbr2Ejoc3oTkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 31 October 2016 at 12:29, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> On 31/10/2016 12:15 a.m., Samuel Williams wrote:
>> Thanks Julian, yes I wondered if that was how it was being explained.
>> It might be the wording of the sentence preceding the table:
>>> would cause the following values to be associated:
>> It might be clearer if it were "could be used to compute the following
>> quality values:"
> It is not computing quality values. The q values are provided by the
> client. It is simply associating those q= values with the possible
> response types.
> Like so:
> 1) take the request Accept list
> 2a) sort by q= value
> 2b) drop explicit types that cannot be produced (ie xml/tar)
> 3) output the response for type at the front of the list
> If you are writing a client to produce Accept lists, then you should do
> the sorting step when generating the request so as to get faster
> responses from the server.
> Amos

Don't forget to disallow anything with q=0.
e.g. you might see: Accept: image/*, image/jpeg; q=0
If the client wants an image format that is *not* a jpeg.
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2016 02:47:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 30 November 2016 02:48:03 UTC