- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:29:06 +1100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 24 November 2016 at 17:20, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Which? Webpush was considering using the field. It's not final yet, but only because there are questions about how to signal keys elsewhere, but you can see a preview: http://webpush-wg.github.io/webpush-encryption/pack_key_hack/ >> a usage that needs strings, then UTF-8 is available to them. > > > Which implies that those who define the use of dictionaries and the way they > are transmitted have full control over what keyids are used. Is this the > case? I don't see why not. For instance, out-of-band can easily restrict this to UTF-8 (or if you get hit on the head some time in the near future, the special JSON UTF-16 with unpaired surrogates mess).
Received on Friday, 25 November 2016 00:29:39 UTC