W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: JFV and Common Structure specifications

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:59:35 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVqH6TPi0OJ5iecYBj2gRich+DMLnxxQJcw9Qn6n-JPBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Patrick McManus <mcmanus@ducksong.com>
On 21 November 2016 at 20:23, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> I think using the angle brackets to say "this header is common
> structure" for privately defined headers should be part of this
> draft, so the future HPACKbis/H3 can semantically compress them
> without needing a white-list.

I'm not yet convinced here.  If that usage came with some other
guarantees (around whitespace use, for example, then maybe the
benefits would outweigh the costs.  I'm definitely opposed to
recursion on the basis that complexity could kill this.

> PS: I'm personally not terribly happy about the name "Common
> Structure", but I found "Http-Header Data Model" even worse.
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:00:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 November 2016 00:00:10 UTC