Re: feedback on draft-murchison-webdav-prefer-09

On 2016-11-15 22:07, Ken Murchison wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/2016 03:59 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2016-11-15 21:56, Ken Murchison wrote:
>>
>>> Just to clarify, which methods do you think need to have additional
>>> references?  PROPFIND, REPORT, and PROPPATCH because we alter the
>>> responses for return=minimal?  Also keep in mind the the server is
>>> always free to ignore the preference if it so chooses.
>>
>> Those, plus MKCOL, right?
>
> Hmm.  I'm not sure we alter anything specified by 4918 or 5689 for
> MKCOL.  Maybe there is an argument that we alter the MKCALENDAR response.

Aren't we altering the response for extended MKCOL?

> I do wonder why 5689 isn't listed as a reference for MKCOL since it adds
> a request body.

Oversight, I would say.

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2016 21:22:01 UTC