W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Comments on draft-stark-expect-ct-00

From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:56:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+cU71mdSVY0c11+2otP2YV-2KChQWw_Ap0iw3L=7xdJ+s7PRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 9 November 2016 at 18:57, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> S 2.1.3.
> What's the rationale for not caching the directive in report-only mode.
> If the purpose of the report-only mode is to tell you when you have
> nonconforming servers, then don't you want to be able to turn it on
> on server A and detect hwen server B is broken? That seems like it
> doesn't work if you don't cache.

I may have more comments, but ++ here. I would like to avoid repeating
the same situation we had with this behavior not being in HPKP.

Received on Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:57:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 10 November 2016 21:57:08 UTC