W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: Is “fr, en; q=0.3” a valid Accept-Language value?

From: Samuel Williams <space.ship.traveller@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:21:30 +1300
Message-ID: <CAHkN8V-gPifMhXt76M5o+ty-A-gAjJvrL=Tt9h8xXW-0CwoX+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Just as a follow up, I've been using other examples on that page as
part of the unit tests.

However, I am finding it hard to understand the final table:

The media type quality factor associated with a given type is
determined by finding the media range with the highest precedence that
matches the type. For example,

  Accept: text/*;q=0.3, text/html;q=0.7, text/html;level=1,
          text/html;level=2;q=0.4, */*;q=0.5

would cause the following values to be associated:

Media Type Quality Value
text/html;level=1 q=1
text/html q=0.7
text/plain q=0.3
image/jpeg q=0.5
text/html;level=2 q=0.4
text/html;level=3 q=0.7

But I fail to see, for example, where image/jpeg comes from or, say,
text/html;level=3 because they aren't listed in the given Accept:
header. Is this a documentation bug?


On 19 October 2016 at 23:20, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2016-10-19 12:03, Samuel Williams wrote:
>>
>> Thanks so much that is really helpful. I didn't know there was a new
>> RFC, and I did look.. I couldn't find it.
>
>
> The place to look is the RFC Editor's status page:
>
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2616>
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2016 09:22:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 30 October 2016 09:22:10 UTC