Re: ID for Immutable

On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The key thing for the document
> is probably not to specify precisely what conditions that it would
> consider this safe to use, but to note that a degree of care might be
> needed to avoid having broken responses cached.
>


+1

Received on Saturday, 29 October 2016 12:48:10 UTC