W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: ID for Immutable

From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 08:43:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrJqR0HYibqPvSwoNqpzfg6uMx7MdkavO9+bQu+9i7tmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
wrote:

> And anyway even MD5 is good enough for this purpose. Something like



rfc 2616 content-md failed before md5-the-algotrithm aged-out for unrelated
reasons.

no need to yoke that complexity to immutable - the fact that it is
trivially deployable gives the standards based approach some hope (and at
least 4 implementations already of a -00). The alternative to a too-complex
reject standard is a set of heuristics in clients that don't behave
consistently across the Internet.
Received on Saturday, 29 October 2016 12:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 29 October 2016 12:43:38 UTC