W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: WiSH: A General Purpose Message Framing over Byte-Stream Oriented Wire Protocols (HTTP)

From: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 18:10:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAH9hSJbHPFSgD0WtRAgyqLrpq7y=GMhyHnvu6x1i_VRUcbitAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Wenbo Zhu <wenboz@google.com>
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@ninenines.eu> wrote:

> On 10/25/2016 11:54 AM, Takeshi Yoshino wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>> Oh, sorry for being unclear. I meant that we'll use
>> "application/subprotocol+webstream". I.e. introducing +webstream as a
>> new media type suffix.
>>
>
> Ah!
>
> OK I have no problem with that.
>
> <snip>
>>     * By the way, don't know if consistency is desirable, by maybe
>>     calling it application/web-stream is better. Maybe not.
>>
>>
>> Could you please elaborate the proposal?
>>
>
> I mean there's already text/event-stream, so application/webstream is not
> consistent with it (missing the dash). But maybe it doesn't matter.


Oh, I see!


>
>
>     * The HEAD method behaves as usual. The PUT method is probably not
>>     compatible with doing this. PATCH and DELETE are not compatible AFAIK.
>>
>>
>> I'm feeling that we should just limit the scope of the proposal to GET
>> and POST.
>>
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> Thanks for the great work! I look forward to implementing this.


Thank you so much for the review and suggestions!
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 09:11:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 25 October 2016 09:11:13 UTC