W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4838)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 10:12:23 +0200
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, pmcmanus@mozilla.com, mnot@mnot.net
Cc: etan.kissling@gmail.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <3a3b3c48-0d71-4c20-6346-5fa9dcb34ff5@greenbytes.de>
On 2016-10-23 01:10, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230,
> "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4838
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Etan Kissling <etan.kissling@gmail.com>
>
> Section: 4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    Parameters are in the form of a name or name=value pair.
>
>      transfer-parameter = token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string )
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    Parameters are in the form of a name or name=value pair.
>
>      transfer-parameter = token
>                         / token BWS "=" BWS ( token / quoted-string )
>
> Notes
> -----
> The form of a name cannot be represented with the original ABNF.
> ...


That's true, but that doesn't mean it's an erratum. If's defined this 
way intentionally, and also hasn't changed compared to RFC 2616.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 23 October 2016 08:12:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 23 October 2016 08:13:01 UTC