W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

From: Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 10:57:10 +0200
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2234bba0-5100-e5f5-ee9e-da81bafe1235@mozilla.com>
On 17.10.2016 23:43, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> 
>> Do you really still see HTTP/0.9 reponses in the wild ?
> 
> Yes. Of course subject to debate around what "in the wild" means...
> 

There was a recent security bug with regards to HTTP/0.9 compat [1] that
suggested a coordinated fix among multiple browsers. Browser vendors
decided that they'd start off killing HTTP/0.9 compat on non-standard
ports only, because overall usage was still too high.
Firefox has HTTP 0.9 usage data[2] and so do other browsers. Please
chime in.

Hope that helps,
Frederik



[1] See entry in Bugzilla with links to Webkit and Chrome bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1262128
[2] I'm new to our telemetry dashboard, so maybe there could be a more
useful graph than this one
 https://telemetry.mozilla.org/new-pipeline/dist.html#!cumulative=0&end_date=2016-09-22&keys=__none__!__none__!__none__&max_channel_version=release%252F49&measure=HTTP_09_INFO&min_channel_version=null&product=Firefox!Fennec&sanitize=1&sort_keys=submissions&start_date=2016-09-16&table=0&trim=1&use_submission_date=0
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:57:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 October 2016 08:57:50 UTC