W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-jfv: what's next

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 20:50:38 +0000
To: Matt Menke <mmenke@google.com>
cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <48270.1476737438@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAEK7mvoXNf_KdpQhj2kwiRLaHm-C1BtjduUgy1cwOnCQ265yzg@mail.gmail.com>
, Matt Menke writes:

>I don't think it needs to be that complicated.  If there's just a prefix
>before all types (Say '#' for numbers, '&' for times, and '!' for
>identifiers), we don't have to exclude the prefix characters from
>identifiers, do we?

True, if we prefix all values we can avoid that problem.

However, that would kill one of the major attraction of CS:  That
19 RFC723x headers already conform to it.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 20:51:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 17 October 2016 20:51:09 UTC