W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: WGLC comment on draft-ietf-httpbis-encryption-encoding-03, was: Encryption content coding simplification

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 20:48:21 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWGqbhTFzO4Z0h3pAVeTzr1Ze1pQSAiMtUkx1Ufq2V60g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On 15 October 2016 at 17:10, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
>> ...where the only difference is that any content coding that *can* have
>> parameters MUST have an associated entry in CE-params.
> This looks like good idea and is unambiguous.

I think that I will need to find a solution to this, and I think that
Julian's (originally phk's) suggestion to put the content encoding
label at the head of each value is a great one in light of this
feedback.  However, maybe we can dispense with the notion that there
is a generic need for content-encoding parameters (and thus avoid the
name change).

I will work on a proposal when it's not late, the weekend, etc...
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2016 09:48:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Saturday, 15 October 2016 09:48:51 UTC