W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: draft-kamp-httpbis-structure-00 comments

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 06:23:59 +0000
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
cc: HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <98491.1476339839@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <20161013042318.8C70F166C2@welho-filter4.welho.com>, Kari Hurtta wri

>So *new* header fields are form
>new-field: >value<
>where syntax of value is h1_common_structure.


>> But if this draft goes forward, the WG essentially promises "This
>> is the last header field parser/serializer we ever ask you to write,
>> and you can already use it for these 19 headers".
>And you can autodetect that syntax from new header fields because > and < -characters.
>This was idea, right?

Yes, exactly.

That means installations can have private headers also in common
structure without having to register those with IANA etc.

Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 13 October 2016 06:24:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 13 October 2016 06:24:34 UTC