W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:57:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=eLCJ=qpzNZknGO0obkK2c2H3pcvRrtM-0D53FXxW2CYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 2016-10-11 11:44, Mike West wrote:
>
>> ...
>> I made this change because of a lint warning that the `sane-cookie-date`
>> definition in the same block was too long. What's a reasonable way of
>> marking both of these up consistently without overflowing the allotted
>> width?
>> ...
>>
>
> This:
>
> -sane-cookie-date  = rfc1123-date
>> -                      ; defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.1
>> +sane-cookie-date  =
>> +   <rfc1123-date, defined in [RFC2616], Section 3.3.1>
>>
>
SGTM, thanks.

What about `domain-value` below: should we change that to something like
`<subdomain, defined in ...>` as well? It doesn't look like line-breaks are
valid inside `<...>`, so maybe the comments are the right option?

-mike
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:58:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:58:07 UTC