W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-00.txt

From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 11:44:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKXHy=fXPVXJ_-EkjCY2n1MD7-hRoXQb63zsJY8pGruGqe+N2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
wrote:

> On 2016-10-11 10:24, Mike West wrote:
>
>> Mark filed https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/243, and I
>> fixed it
>> in https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/79fc688f3b9
>> 5febb9b53e2500221697cab563f8a.
>> I'm sure we'll find more formatting issues over the next week or so that
>> arose from the port from the flat text file to Markdown, so I'll hold
>> off on publishing a -01 draft until those shake out.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -mike
>>
>
> FWIW, I believe this change:
>
> Old:
>
>   token = <token, defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2>
>
> New:
>
>   token = token
>             ; defined in [RFC2616], Section 2.2
>
> is a bad idea; it makes the ABNF invalid.
>

I made this change because of a lint warning that the `sane-cookie-date`
definition in the same block was too long. What's a reasonable way of
marking both of these up consistently without overflowing the allotted
width?

-mike
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:45:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 11 October 2016 09:45:43 UTC