- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:32:07 +0200
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2016-10-05 14:22, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 5 October 2016 at 04:38, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote: >> Should we just define SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED and call it a day? > > I believe that Julian was the one that observed that h2 isn't any more > special than http/1.1 here. Julian? > > FWIW, I can live with this. It's certainly a LOT simpler. Only > servers with modern stacks are going to handle this properly, and > coupling it to h2 doesn't hurt that much. I have to admit that I'm not up-to-date with respect to this spec. That said, if the spec can be made simpler by just treating HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 the same this sounds like a win to me. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 12:32:47 UTC