W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2016

Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-07.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 14:32:07 +0200
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Cc: Kari hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, HTTP working group mailing list <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <597bf038-a347-8419-ccc0-01e9d3602c63@gmx.de>
On 2016-10-05 14:22, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On 5 October 2016 at 04:38, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Should we just define SETTINGS_MIXED_SCHEME_PERMITTED and call it a day?
>
> I believe that Julian was the one that observed that h2 isn't any more
> special than http/1.1 here.  Julian?
>
> FWIW, I can live with this.  It's certainly a LOT simpler.  Only
> servers with modern stacks are going to handle this properly, and
> coupling it to h2 doesn't hurt that much.

I have to admit that I'm not up-to-date with respect to this spec.

That said, if the spec can be made simpler by just treating HTTP/1.1 and 
HTTP/2 the same this sounds like a win to me.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2016 12:32:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 October 2016 12:32:49 UTC