W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-encryption-04

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:29:03 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUy+hBLyS7RexkfzMaYrHCp_VYA8ZqtQ=UMt7fOb1Nd3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
On 31 March 2016 at 17:54, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> I believe this needs to be rephrased to better explain the actual problem;
> and I also remain unconvinced that the conclusion wrt HTTP/1.1 makes sense.

Maybe I'm a little too close to this now.  I can't see how I might
rephrase this differently.  Do you have a suggestion?

I also would prefer not to have a carve-out for HTTP/1.1 here.  If you
want to ask the question again, I look to our chair (and shepherd) for
Received on Thursday, 31 March 2016 07:29:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 31 March 2016 07:29:36 UTC