W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7540 (4647)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 19:33:15 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVPoFrvg3+RrKsiu3AvCumVS9H-YgiOcc1uf3K0dV5ZiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: Mike Belshe <mike@belshe.com>, Roberto Peon <fenix@google.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, jingzl@microsoft.com, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 29 March 2016 at 19:19, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 2 editorial issues in section 5.1 and section 11.2.


Valid.  Though neither demand a change.  Lowercase "may" is
acceptable, though perhaps a poor choice of word in context.  And
s/Section/Specification aligns better with the registration template,
but worse with the document itself.

We should mark this "Hold for document update"
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 08:33:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 29 March 2016 08:33:47 UTC