W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT)

From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:19:36 +0000
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org, "Mike Bishop" <michael.bishop@microsoft.com>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, michael.bishop@microsoft.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, shares@ndzh.com
Message-Id: <20160303131851.24634.26082.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A clear sentence such as this one would have helped me:
OLD:
  This specification defines a new concept in HTTP, "Alternative
  Services", that allows an origin server to nominate additional means
  of interacting with it on the network.  
NEW:
  This specification defines a new concept in HTTP, "Alternative
  Services", applicable to both HTTP 1.1 and HTTP 2.0, that allows 
  an origin server to nominate additional means of interacting with 
  it on the network.  

I overlooked this info in the following sentence, i.e. the fact that HTTP
header = HTTP 1.1:

  It defines a general
  framework for this in Section 2, along with specific mechanisms for
  advertising their existence using HTTP header fields (Section 3) or
  HTTP/2 frames (Section 4), plus a way to indicate that an alternative
  service was used (Section 5).
Received on Saturday, 5 March 2016 12:52:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC