W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-13: (with COMMENT)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 13:59:39 +1100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Mike Bishop <michael.bishop@microsoft.com>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F291F271-6D4F-4E36-BC13-1438D9FB911D@mnot.net>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Hi Spencer,

> A couple of very nitty nits.
> 
> In this text
> 
>   When the protocol does not explicitly carry the scheme (e.g., as is
>   usually the case for HTTP/1.1 over TLS, servers can mitigate this
>                                         ^
> I think there's a missing closing parenthesis right around here.
> 
> If there's not, I'm having trouble parsing the sentence.

Already fixed.

>   risk by either assuming that all requests have an insecure context,
>   or by refraining from advertising alternative services for insecure
>   schemes (such as HTTP).
> 
> If there was an obvious reference for SPDY in this text
> 
>   The Alt-Svc header field was influenced by the design of the
>   Alternate-Protocol header field in SPDY.
> 
> that might be useful to include.

There's a URL; not sure how stable though.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2016 03:00:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC