W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: #148: Reasonable Assurances and H2C

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 12:00:01 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVuLVrukcVuBK54q9YAzwBaKUp3yy7QRtXNSxqyZBf2+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 29 February 2016 at 03:53, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org> wrote:
> Well, "reasonable assurances" can be protocol
> element.

They are not currently, though if we wanted them to be, then we could
write a document that updates this one to do that.  That document
might then define a registry.  No point in overengineering here.
Received on Monday, 29 February 2016 01:00:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC