W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: Alissa Cooper's Yes on draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-12: (with COMMENT)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:01:35 +1100
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org, Mike Bishop <michael.bishop@microsoft.com>, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <B2859A72-1EE3-4D56-B5E8-D5EF7742E1E9@mnot.net>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Hi Alissa,

> On 26 Feb 2016, at 10:55 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:
> 
> Couple of places where the language used was confusing for me:
> 
> = Sec 2.4 =
> 
> s/it can be used until the alternative connection is established./the
> existing connection can be used until the alternative connection is
> established./

That would make it:

The client does not need to block requests on any existing connection; the existing connection can be used until the alternative connection is established.

... which is a bit repetitive. How about:

The client does not need to block requests on the existing connection(s), which can be used until the alternative connection is established.

> = Sec 3.1 =
> 
> OLD
> Unknown parameters MUST be ignored, that is
>   the values (alt-value) they appear in MUST be processed as if the
>   unknown parameter was not present.
> 
> NEW
> Unknown parameters MUST be ignored. That is,
>   the values (alt-value) in which they appear MUST be processed as if
> the
>   unknown parameters were not present.

https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/de90f7fe1a7e360

Thanks!


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 26 February 2016 01:02:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC