W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2016

Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10)

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:05:55 +1100
Cc: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <D186F082-C1A2-40DE-943B-C380F4D3FDE6@mnot.net>
To: Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>
Sounds like people are OK with this -- I'll merge unless I hear otherwise soon.


> On 20 Jan 2016, at 3:20 am, Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> Still not wild about the character-for-character part, but as noted, that's off the critical path by moving to Opp-Sec.  The Alt-Svc changes work for me.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] 
> Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 4:40 PM
> To: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
> Cc: Kari Hurtta <hurtta-ietf@elmme-mailer.org>; Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>; Mike Bishop <Michael.Bishop@microsoft.com>; Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>; Julian F. Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>; draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc@ietf.org; HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: non authenticated alternate services (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-10)
> 
> 
>> On 19 Jan 2016, at 10:15 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 19 Jan 2016, at 7:32 am, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> If the phrase "strong authentication" is making this hard to understand, we might use something else (e.g., "have reasonable assurances that the alternative service is under control of the origin").
>>> 
>>> that's better. maybe tweak with the "valid for the whole origin" concept? That would certainly include both valid cert as well as the .wk approach.. 
>> 
>> WFM. I'll update the branch.
> 
> Diff from current ED here:
>  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/compare/altsvc-samehost?diff=split&name=altsvc-samehost


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 05:06:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 22 March 2016 12:47:11 UTC