- From: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 16:12:31 +0900
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
2016-05-31 14:24 GMT+09:00 Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>: > >> On 15 May 2016, at 1:43 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> From small to large: >> >> Nit: >> 2. If "W" and "V" are equal, continue to the next "V". >> >> This should be next "W", I think. > > There is no next W... > > >> I think that Q would be better encoded as a series of 0 bits followed >> by a 1 bit. The reason I say that is that it is (marginally) easier >> to generate the values then by masking in the R value in the right >> place in a freshly calloc'd piece of memory. > > I'm not fussed; Kazuho? I do not mind either way, so it might be better to change it now. > >> This document really needs to describe what the contents of the cache >> digest are, and to describe how to decode the cache digest. Without >> defining what it means to receive and decode this information, this >> specification almost says nothing at all. > > Whatever happened to "left as an exercise to the reader?" > > :) > > Yes, we do. > > Cheers, > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > -- Kazuho Oku
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2016 07:13:00 UTC