- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 08:40:38 +0200
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, fielding@gbiv.com, ylafon@w3.org, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, mnot@mnot.net
- Cc: kannan@cakoose.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 2016-04-29 23:26, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7233, > "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Range Requests". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7233&eid=4681 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Kannan Goundan <kannan@cakoose.com> > > Section: 2.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > byte-range-set = 1#( byte-range-spec / suffix-byte-range-spec ) > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > byte-range-set = *( "," OWS ) ( byte-range-spec / > suffix-byte-range-spec ) *( OWS "," [ OWS ( byte-range-spec / > suffix-byte-range-spec ) ] ) > > > Notes > ----- > The document contains two ABNF definitions for "byte-range-set". They appear in Section 2.1 "Byte Ranges" and Appendix D "Collected ABNF". > > The two definitions are different. It seems like the definition in Appendix D is the correct one. > ... Both are correct. See first sentence of Appendix D. Best regards, Julian
Received on Saturday, 30 April 2016 06:41:11 UTC