W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04: (with COMMENT)

From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:43:58 +0000
Cc: draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status@ietf.org, httpbis-chairs@ietf.org, mnot@pobox.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, fred Baker <Fred@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <20151216094329.25989.93991.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Why do we have this sentence?

  Feedback should occur on the ietf-http-wg@w3.org mailing list.

What sort of feedback is expected, if this becomes an RFC?
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 15:30:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC