W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: draft-west-cookie-prefixes-05 comments

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:11:46 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWv+KWYdfFXQEuQB19B-uWvSM_Gn+k9V+7HiRhUtzvHMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 4 December 2015 at 16:21, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> wrote:
> If it's really an issue, I think it makes the most sense to choose something
> that isn't valid in any language of choice, since there's a good chance
> someone has used all the valid-looking ones somewhere in some hacky kluge.


As long as APL exists, there will be a choice that uses any character
you can use :)
Received on Friday, 4 December 2015 07:12:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC