W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Last Calls

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 16:26:55 -0800
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWFFpK9BBjM8_nW3W=Ea6H+DY+ycUehgBD0FWdUCEqgKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
That, and comments during IETF last call are never good.
On Nov 28, 2015 2:25 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I suppose that might be because the Americans have had a holiday.
>
> If anyone would like more time to look at #1, please say so. Of course,
> IETF LC is another opportunity to give feedback on it.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 28 Nov 2015, at 8:20 pm, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there!
> >
> > I'd like to remind everybody that we have a number of Last Calls ending
> in a few days where I have seen little feedback (to say it politely...).
> >
> > 1) HTTP WG LC: <
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-09>
> >
> > 2) In IETF LC: <
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-legally-restricted-status-04
> >
> >
> > and, also HTTP related:
> >
> > 3) in IETF LC: <
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-http-problem-01>
> >
> > Best regards, Julian
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2015 00:27:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC