W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: Browsers and .onion names

From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:56:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD77+gSTP9QD-zh3AgNMKjJhY6fof2CQ8BE30ZgTWRNk8ws9nQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Cory Benfield <cory@lukasa.co.uk>, Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@appelbaum.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> If it's really bugging people, we can try to get an errata in, but I suspect the wording is going to be tricky, and likely quite verbose.

It's not bugging me.

That being said, what about the reasonably opaque "implementors who
can reasonably expect some of their users to use Tor-enabled services
[and/or to use .onion addresses by accident] etc. pp." as a middle
ground?


Richard
Received on Sunday, 29 November 2015 11:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:11:40 UTC